Both Burger and Anderson behaved arrogantly and childishly in this episode. Anderson was angry that Perry was one step ahead of him. Well tough. Maybe if you had done your job a little better instead of trying to charge the most obvious suspects and letting your ego get in the way, you would have been there first. When Andy came in to find Perry holding the murder weapon, he balled up his little fists like a child. It was very obvious Perry had just discovered the gun himself so what was Andy's problem? The show was heading in the right direction by creating a more congenial relationship between Perry and the police. It was disheartening to see the writers falling back on the old hat adversity between Perry and the police we saw in earlier seasons. When Burger advised Perry not to go to his client's home because Anderson is there, it was borderline illegal. Neither Burger nor Anderson had any right to bar Perry from seeing his client. And all their arrogance was once again misplaced because Perry turned out to be on the right track all along. Shouldn't the writing be getting better in later seasons? - DellaMason
+I've noticed that this often happens when an Erle Stanley Gardner novel-plot is used. Over the many seasons of the show, the characters have developed in a slightly different direction than their characterization in Gardner's books. It's always a bit jarring to have an ESG-based episode in the later seasons because the characters "revert" to being more hard-edged and antagonistic, the way that Gardner wrote them. Using an ESG plot also accounts for the issues identified in other posts about the plot having holes or seeming disjointed. There is a difference between writing a plot for a 50 min. TV show and adapting a plot from a full-length novel to fit into a TV episode, and the adaptation isn't always successful. That said, there is a complexity and noirish atmosphere in this episode that is sometimes missing from non-ESG stories. Submitted by Miss Carmody, 29 Feb. 2024

When Helen's boyfriend Frank was shot, I couldn't help thinking it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. All he does is march around in his college boy blazer complaining and yelling at Helen. Would have liked to have seen Helen smack him and throw him out on his ear. DM

Uncle "Franklin" - boyfriend "Frank"? How Froodian, as Paul would have quipped in TCOT Prankish Professor. jfh 23May2024

Last episode with Perry’s arm immobilized. Submitted by Francis, 10 June 2011.
+ AND Perry also runs w/that arm sling when he hears Helen scream after finding the body in the car! Run Perry Run! ;-> submitted by mesave31, 01/29/15
++ AND this allows Della to serve in an unusual role: chauffeur. I believe there have been several instances where Della took the wheel from Perry, but I think this is the first where she took it in place of him. Submitted by Notcom, 052016.

The Eerily Empty Bookcase has been moved to Perry's office, apparently for the sole purpose of giving the Careless Kitten a perch from which to jump in the final scene.
In the version I just watched, immediately after Perry, Helen, and Gerald discover the body, Perry is shown on the phone calling the Shore house and asking for Gerald - he is then shown back at the car with Helen and Gerald.
+Glad you also noticed that. That whole phone call was odd. I kept asking myself why is he asking for Gerald when Gerald is right there with him at the time? Also, what is the point of Cosmo? Is he just a red herring? Submitted by Wick 4/25/2022.
++Even if there was a scene filmed and then later cut out, it still wouldn't make sense. Perry mentioned that he left the crime scene to phone the police. However, he returned right afterward. Unless Gerald was not originally in the scene with the discovery of the body and they rewrote the story at the last minute? I wondered if the scene was accidentally edited in out of order, but there were no discernible cuts between the phone call to the police and to the Shore residence. Maybe Perry asked for Gerald to see what the butler would say? That's the only explanation that makes sense. Continuity really dropped the ball in this episode. DM 1/24
+++I don't think this is a continuity problem--clearly Perry is asking for Gerald to see what the butler would say. Perry is trying to find out who is in the house, and to locate where all of the suspects might be. Submitted by Miss Carmody, 29 Feb. 2024.

Another episode with a good story undone by clumsy dialogue, exposition, and direction, as if done in a hurry. DOD 03/13/19

This is, indeed, unique in all the 271 PM episodes. Not only is the direction and the camera-work unprecedented - but a unique scene between Burger and Mason in Perry's office, discussing the case, ex party. This kind of personalization of Burger is rare, indeed. (TCOT Prudent Prosecutor, TCO Paul Drake's Dilemma, TCOT Lame Canary, TCOT Dead Ringer.) dwhite 1.20.13
+ IMHO Burger evidences a condesending attitude toward Della as he discusses the issues then glances at her and says that maybe he's saying too much. The look she gives him in return should be included in the "Della Looks On" site! jfh 23Feb2017.

The usually taciturn Sgt. Brice has as many lines in this episode as he ever had, few though they are. Submitted by francis, 3/8/12.

I liked the kitty cat. I'm surprised that no credit was given to the cat handler/trainer...
+ A day after I saw this episode on MeTV, I happened to see part of an episode of Mister Ed (probably episode 138, "The Horse and the Pussycat," OAD 10-31-65) on Antenna TV that featured what appeared to be the same cat! RIP, cat. Submitted by cat lover 65tosspowertrap, 1-18-2014.
++ I always think that too, RIP all the dogs and cats I see in old TV shows. RIP Monkey the Siamese. Submitted by cat lover DyNama, 2/19/2016
+++ If this cat appeared on Mr. Ed, its trainer was Frank Inn. He did all the animals for Green Acres, Mr. Ed, Petticoat Junction, and so forth. And the movie "Benji," of course. He trained animals of various species -- the cat in "Breakfast at Tiffany's" a troop of camels, and Arnold Ziffel the pig, (or rather a series of them). Submitted by catyron, October 10th, 2021.

Minor goof: there is no poison ivy in Los Angeles. The deceased should have been buried beneath the poison oak (but I don’t envy the one with that chore). SoCalSis, June 16, 2023.

WEIRD REACTION (IMHO of course) by Helen, after Frank gets shot *inside the house* after opening a door, and she does not even look where the shot came from, help Frank, or even more...seemingly not worry that she will get shot next since the shooter is IN THE HOUSE and in the next room WITH A GUN!!! ;-> submitted by mesave31, 01/29/15
+ Other weirdness: When Perry and Paul accompany Thomas to his house, they all spend an inordinate amount of time outside instead of going in to check on Franklin. jfh 01Mar2018.

Continuity Error: When Perry, Paul and Thomas follow the floury cat prints to Thomas's kitchen, the lid is on the canister (interestingly labelled "Cookies"), but, when the kitten comes into the kitchen, suddenly the lid is no longer on the canister. jfh 05Jul2018.

Not a continuity error, as such, but, in the "confession" scene, Helen wears the same dress as she did in the opening scenes. jfh 13Mar2019

[Comments moved below Spoiler flag because of contents]

---in the book, there is a question of name switch in Florida, in which one man found a Doppelgänger; this occurred ten years prior to the story, and this created confusion as to who actually was now in LA. Of course, because the one was thought to be deceased, there could be no credible blackmail. Yes, it's weak, but in the book it's an okay line. cgraul 2.12.16

Continuity: When Matilda was chasing the cat after it jumped on the table her necklace mysteriously becomes unlatched in the front. Kilo 10/14/2018.

Notice the way Della flutters her eyelashes at Burger when she asks him "What if you find him murdered, too, Mr. Burger?". Cute. Kilo 10/14/2018.

Spoiler Warning! Do Not Read Below If You Have Not Seen The Episode

Cold case / old case: Perry also solved the murder of Franklin Shore - killed 10 years earlier. This was the final time Perry discovered clues from a past death. Submitted by H. Mason 9/27/14

Why wait ten years to get rid of the blackmailer? And what was to be gained by intimating Franklin was still alive? Seems to me it would be to Matilda's benefit to have him declared dead once and for all. DOD 03/12/19

I think that as part of the blackmail scheme, Leach would want Matilda to keep insisting that Franklin was still alive. If he were declared dead, then Leach might have revealed what happened to the police, but he would not get any money. Of course, it might've behooved Matilda and her faithful gardener to move the body someplace else so the blackmailer would have nothing to hold her on. 01.02.2022 Submitted by Kenmore

Has anybody read the Erle Stanley Gardner work that inspired this episode? It's hard to imagine Mr. G would have such a major error in one of his stories. Anytime a blackmailer gets killed by the person paying, the story is flawed. Too many recent stories have had this mistake (#216, 226 and 228). In episode 229 a person attempting blackmail was killed immediately. That's the way it probably would happen. Why did it take so long in this story? Any smart blackmailer would have documents of the damaging information with another person to be given to legal authorities in case of death and the person paying must know about it. In the 1972 movie Super Fly a person who had something on a politician went to a crime syndicate and paid for a contract to kill the politician and his family if he died. In "Northern Explosion" a 1994 episode of Murder, She Wrote a blackmailer with "insurance" was killed by another person and the payer knew he had to leave the area right away. There are many other crime stories where a blackmail situation was presented in a more believable manner. Submitted by H. Mason 4/28/15
+ I disagree, H. Blackmailers count on the income, they don't want to share, they rarely tell anybody else they have something on the victim, and would be loath to put in writing the location of the blackmail material. Do blackmailers have friends, associates, or lawyers they can trust not to read the letter and cash in on it themselves? And perhaps kill the blackmailer to get rid of the competition? There's only 3 things to do about blackmail: Pay, somehow make the material worthless, or kill the blackmailer. The 2nd tactic is the only practical solution, and of course the other 2 are not recommended. Does anybody know of this old "deliver to authorities in case of my death" trick actually working? Authorities catching your killer after you've been murdered would be poor consolation. The blackmailer should warn the victim about the trick but not actually write it down. Submitted by DyNama, 11/3/2018

The story is convoluted and could've benefitted with a few more drafts. Matilda kills Franklin and pays/coerces the gardener to bury him out back. Leech, apparently an old friend of Franklin AND a next door neighbor sees or at least deduces what happened and starts the blackmail scheme because she is loaded. It becomes less logical after that. Matilda should've either killed Leach right away or gotten rid of the body so there is no evidence. Keeping the illusion of Franklin being alive only works if Franklin had a will that would cause Matilda to lose out on a LOT of money or Leach insisting as such, though he could still blackmail her anyway. It is rather clever to blame Leach's death on Franklin and plant clues to indicate that is the case. But they are clumsy clues, especially the whole business at the gardener's (Thomas) house. Oh well, considering this is a weekly TV show, writers often lack the time to work things out properly. 01/02/2022 Submitted by Kenmore

Spoiler Warning! Do Not Read Below If You Have Not Seen The Episode
MAJOR SPOILER: the murderer is (Louise Latham as) Matilda Shore. jfh 10Jun2024